ACR Dyno 546rwhp/ 511rwtq

MiSdIrEcTeD_1 · January 22nd, 2009, 03:07 AM

Bone stock 2008...

2008 Dodge Viper ACR on the Dyno- Video

Sadistic · January 22nd, 2009, 07:24 AM

Is that about 630hp at the crank?

Arlington Texas · January 22nd, 2009, 09:14 AM

That's healthy.

MiSdIrEcTeD_1 · January 22nd, 2009, 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sadistic

Is that about 630hp at the crank?

Assuming 13% loss that puts it around 615. Not too shabby really...

torquemonster · January 22nd, 2009, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sadistic

Is that about 630hp at the crank?

That'd be spot on where I'd put it. 546 + 10 / 0.88 = 631

MarshallTK · January 24th, 2009, 03:19 AM

Thats weird? I thought it had 600 hp? Or at least what dodge says. hmm.

MiSdIrEcTeD_1 · January 24th, 2009, 05:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarshallTK

Thats weird? I thought it had 600 hp? Or at least what dodge says. hmm.

Casey111 · January 24th, 2009, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarshallTK

Thats weird? I thought it had 600 hp? Or at least what dodge says. hmm.

That would be the flywheels hp rating. Just like every other manufacturer uses.

makara · January 24th, 2009, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MiSdIrEcTeD_1

Assuming 13% loss that puts it around 615. Not too shabby really...

Remember, if you are figuring for 13%, figure 13% for the flywheel hp, not the rwhp. A 13% gain from the 546 at the rear wheels gives you about 617hp, which is only a 11.5% loss from the flywheel.

MarshallTK · January 24th, 2009, 07:29 PM

The ACR is good in my book. Its also a lot faster than the SRT-10. But it only tops 176. : /

b3rndtt0ast · January 24th, 2009, 08:12 PM

.. its a TRACK car.... its not all about the topend... down force = drag...
it has the same HP as any other 80/09 viper...

makara · January 24th, 2009, 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarshallTK

The ACR is good in my book. Its also a lot faster than the SRT-10. But it only tops 176. : /

MarshallTK is an AE, right?

b3rndtt0ast · January 24th, 2009, 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by makara

MarshallTK is an AE, right?

actually.. no. thats what sad.

MiSdIrEcTeD_1 · January 24th, 2009, 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by makara

MarshallTK is an AE, right?

I thought so until I saw the same drabble on other boards (link posted previously). I dont think anyone would go to those lengths to authenticate an AE, but then again, nothing really surprises me in this community...

Rocman · January 24th, 2009, 11:42 PM

Those are good numbers. When I dynoed my ACR, I got 524 RWHP, but it was done on a very conservative dyno. I was told it would have made 40-50 more on any other dyno. This was at DC.

Disturbed ACR · February 10th, 2009, 10:09 PM

I've been looking to do a fun run with an 08 viper vs my 01. That would make for a great vid.

bushido · February 23rd, 2009, 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rocman

Those are good numbers. When I dynoed my ACR, I got 524 RWHP, but it was done on a very conservative dyno. I was told it would have made 40-50 more on any other dyno. This was at DC.

A little late here..
But thats true about DC's dyno. Even Jonathon, aka Redsled dynoed his race viper GTS on another dyno. And it read 35 more RWHP.. Not to mention Dan Cragin telling me this beforehand..

Rocman · February 23rd, 2009, 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bushido

A little late here..
But thats true about DC's dyno. Even Jonathon, aka Redsled dynoed his race viper GTS on another dyno. And it read 35 more RWHP.. Not to mention Dan Cragin telling me this beforehand..

Thank you for verifying this. There have been a few doubters.

billseast · February 27th, 2009, 06:16 PM

There where 6 or 7 ACRs at button willow last weekend

BackAtYaMOFO · February 27th, 2009, 06:59 PM

So, then my GTS has at least 35 more rear wheel Hp than what DC showed on their dyno Sheet? I wonder if this would be a consistent lack of HP showing or would it be a percentage? So if 500 should read as 535, then add 7 HP per hundred?,

Wow, this is the cheapest HP I've ever gotten!

January 22nd, 2009, 09:14 AM	#3
Arlington Texas Senior Member Arlington Texas's Garage: DODGE VIPER Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: No Cal Posts: 2,302 Casino Cash: $406495	That's healthy. __________________ Next year.

January 24th, 2009, 11:42 PM	#15
Rocman ...... Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 2,532 Casino Cash: $1429	Those are good numbers. When I dynoed my ACR, I got 524 RWHP, but it was done on a very conservative dyno. I was told it would have made 40-50 more on any other dyno. This was at DC. __________________

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

January 22nd, 2009, 07:24 AM	#2
Sadistic Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Orlando, FL Posts: 859 Casino Cash: $26830	Is that about 630hp at the crank?

January 24th, 2009, 03:19 AM	#6
MarshallTK Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 129 Casino Cash: $9129 My Mood:	Thats weird? I thought it had 600 hp? Or at least what dodge says. hmm.

January 24th, 2009, 07:29 PM	#10
MarshallTK Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 129 Casino Cash: $9129 My Mood:	The ACR is good in my book. Its also a lot faster than the SRT-10. But it only tops 176. : /

January 24th, 2009, 08:12 PM	#11
b3rndtt0ast Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 325 Casino Cash: $247	.. its a TRACK car.... its not all about the topend... down force = drag... it has the same HP as any other 80/09 viper...

February 10th, 2009, 10:09 PM	#16
Disturbed ACR Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 526 Casino Cash: $12130 My Mood:	I've been looking to do a fun run with an 08 viper vs my 01. That would make for a great vid.

February 27th, 2009, 06:16 PM	#19
billseast Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 34 Casino Cash: $5482	There where 6 or 7 ACRs at button willow last weekend

February 27th, 2009, 06:59 PM	#20
BackAtYaMOFO Senior Member BackAtYaMOFO's Garage: DODGE VIPER AUDI Q7 4.2 PREMIUM QUATTRO DODGE RAM 3500 Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 482 Casino Cash: $16510	So, then my GTS has at least 35 more rear wheel Hp than what DC showed on their dyno Sheet? I wonder if this would be a consistent lack of HP showing or would it be a percentage? So if 500 should read as 535, then add 7 HP per hundred?, Wow, this is the cheapest HP I've ever gotten!